Detailed Case Information - TPO25-00639

Case Description: TPO25-00639 - SKYLYN JACKSON VS. TAYLOR FASSETT

Filing Date: 04/21/2025

Case Type: TP - REQ TEMPORARY PROTECTIVE ORDER

Status: Case Disposed

Printer Friendly Version

Case Parties

Seq No. Type Name
1 JUDG - Judge ROCOVITS, MASTER ILIN
2 APPL - Applicant JACKSON, SKYLYN P.
3 ADVP - Adverse Party FASSETT, TAYLOR ANTHONY

Reference Numbers

No Cross Reference Numbers Available

Event Information

Date/Time Hearing Judge Event Description Outcome
1. 07/10/2025 at 9:00 AM Honorable MASTER ROCOVITS H412 - HRG-ISSUE TPO CHILDREN
D829 - TPO Denied Ord Extending filed on: 07/10/2025
2. 04/21/2025 at 2:56 PM Honorable MASTER ROCOVITS H320 - HEARING ON EX PARTE FILING
D445 - Heard - Continued filed on: 04/21/2025

Docket Entry Information

Docket Description Date Filed
1. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 07/10/2025
2. 1940 - Master's Findings/Recommend 07/10/2025
3. F278 - Denied with Hearing 07/10/2025
4. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 07/08/2025
5. 2610 - Notice ... 07/08/2025
6. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 06/11/2025
7. 1067 - Affidavit/Declaration of Service 06/11/2025
8. 1940 - Master's Findings/Recommend 06/04/2025
9. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 06/04/2025
10. MIN - ***Minutes 06/04/2025
11. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 06/04/2025
12. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 05/27/2025
13. 1067 - Affidavit/Declaration of Service 05/27/2025
14. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 05/13/2025
15. 1940 - Master's Findings/Recommend 05/13/2025
16. 3385 - Personal Case Inf. UCCJEA 04/21/2025
17. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 04/21/2025
18. DVCIS - Domestic Violence Confidential Information Sheet 04/21/2025
19. 1255 - Application for TPO 04/21/2025
20. 1940 - Master's Findings/Recommend 04/21/2025
The District Court is comprised of 16 departments. Each Judge sits in a differently numbered Department. When a Judge leaves service, the new Judge's name replaces the former Judge's name on all matters pending and previously closed in that department. This change will not reflect that a previous sitting Judge presided over a matter.