Please fill out at least one field before submitting this form.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Detailed Case Information - TPO21-01145

Case Description: TPO21-01145 - OLIVIA THOMAS VS. MAX PENA

Filing Date: 08/02/2021

Case Type: TP - REQ TEMPORARY PROTECTIVE ORDER

Status: Case Disposed

Printer Friendly Version

Case Parties - Click to expand

Case Parties

Seq No. Type Name
1 JUDG - Judge ROCOVITS, MASTER ILIN
2 APPL - Applicant THOMAS, OLIVIA ROSE
3 ADVP - Adverse Party PENA, MAX MICHAEL

Cross Reference Number(s) - Click to expand

Reference Numbers

No Cross Reference Numbers Available

Event Information - Click to expand

Event Information

Date/Time Hearing Judge Event Description Outcome
1. 08/02/2021 at 3:52 PM Honorable MASTER ROCOVITS H320 - HEARING ON EX PARTE FILING
D425 - Granted filed on: 08/02/2021
Extra Text: NO EX PARTE TPO INTERVIEW...NO CLERK...45-DAY PROTECTION ORDER

Docket Entry Information - Click to expand

Docket Entry Information

Docket Description Date Filed Extra Text
1. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 08/11/2021 Extra Text: Transaction 8589099 - Approved By: NOREVIEW : 08-11-2021:08:07:19
2. 1067 - Affidavit/Declaration of Service 08/11/2021 Extra Text: ADVP SERVED TPO 08-03-2021 - Transaction 8589092 - Approved By: NOREVIEW : 08-11-2021:08:06:22
3. DVCIS - Domestic Violence Confidential Information Sheet 08/02/2021 Extra Text: Transaction 8573568 - Approved By: MDAVIS : 08-02-2021:14:52:14
4. F277 - Granted without Hearing 08/02/2021 Extra Text:
5. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 08/02/2021 Extra Text: Transaction 8574074 - Approved By: NOREVIEW : 08-02-2021:16:40:31
6. 1255 - Application for TPO 08/02/2021 Extra Text: Transaction 8573568 - Approved By: MDAVIS : 08-02-2021:14:52:14
7. 4165 - Temporary Protective Order 08/02/2021 Extra Text: 45-DAY PROTECTION ORDER....EXP 09-16-2021 AT 23:59 - Transaction 8574066 - Approved By: NOREVIEW : 08-02-2021:16:39:29
The District Court is comprised of 16 departments. Each Judge sits in a differently numbered Department. When a Judge leaves service, the new Judge's name replaces the former Judge's name on all matters pending and previously closed in that department. This change will not reflect that a previous sitting Judge presided over a matter.