Please fill out at least one field before submitting this form.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Detailed Case Information - TPO19-02124

Case Description: TPO19-02124 - AMY GIANNINI VS. JOHN COE

Filing Date: 12/03/2019

Case Type: TP - REQ TEMPORARY PROTECTIVE ORDER

Status: Case Disposed

Printer Friendly Version

Case Parties - Click to expand

Case Parties

Seq No. Type Name
1 JUDG - Judge ROCOVITS, MASTER ILIN
2 APPL - Applicant GIANNINI, AMY MARIE
3 ADVP - Adverse Party COE, JOHNNY

Cross Reference Number(s) - Click to expand

Reference Numbers

No Cross Reference Numbers Available

Event Information - Click to expand

Event Information

Date/Time Hearing Judge Event Description Outcome
1. 12/03/2019 at 2:00 PM Honorable MASTER ROCOVITS H320 - HEARING ON EX PARTE FILING
D829 - TPO Denied Ord Extending filed on: 12/03/2019
Extra Text: NO EX PARTE TPO INTERVIEW.................NO BASIS................NO CLERK

Docket Entry Information - Click to expand

Docket Entry Information

Docket Description Date Filed Extra Text
1. 3385 - Personal Case Inf. UCCJEA 12/03/2019 Extra Text: Transaction 7616464 - Approved By: MDAVIS : 12-03-2019:11:33:05
2. 1255 - Application for TPO 12/03/2019 Extra Text: Transaction 7616464 - Approved By: MDAVIS : 12-03-2019:11:33:05
3. F276 - Denied without Hearing 12/03/2019 Extra Text:
4. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 12/03/2019 Extra Text: Transaction 7617729 - Approved By: NOREVIEW : 12-03-2019:16:23:16
5. DVCIS - Domestic Violence Confidential Information Sheet 12/03/2019 Extra Text: Transaction 7616464 - Approved By: MDAVIS : 12-03-2019:11:33:05
6. 2841 - Ord Denying TPO 12/03/2019 Extra Text: Transaction 7617723 - Approved By: NOREVIEW : 12-03-2019:16:22:06
The District Court is comprised of 16 departments. Each Judge sits in a differently numbered Department. When a Judge leaves service, the new Judge's name replaces the former Judge's name on all matters pending and previously closed in that department. This change will not reflect that a previous sitting Judge presided over a matter.