Detailed Case Information - TPO19-01374

Case Description: TPO19-01374 - AMBER LUCKEY VS. PATRICK LUCKEY

Filing Date: 07/29/2019

Case Type: TP - REQ TEMPORARY PROTECTIVE ORDER

Status: Case Disposed

Printer Friendly Version

Case Parties
Seq No. Type Name
1 JUDG - Judge ILIN ROCOVITS, COMMISSIONER
2 APPL - Applicant LUCKEY, AMBER
3 ADVP - Adverse Party LUCKEY, PATRICK THOMAS
Reference Numbers
No Cross Reference Numbers Available
Event Information
Date/Time Hearing Judge Event Description Outcome
1. 09/12/2019 at 9:30 AM Honorable COMMISSIONER ILIN ROCOVITS H332 - EXTENDED HEARING - NO CHILDREN
D829 - TPO Denied Ord Extending filed on: 09/12/2019
2. 07/30/2019 at 4:59 PM Honorable COMMISSIONER ILIN ROCOVITS EX1 - EX-PARTE MOTION
EX200 - Ex Parte Motion Complete filed on: 08/01/2019
3. 07/30/2019 at 8:30 AM Honorable COMMISSIONER ILIN ROCOVITS H320 - HEARING ON EX PARTE FILING
D445 - Heard - Continued filed on: 07/30/2019
Docket Entry Information
Docket Description Date Filed
1. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 09/12/2019
2. 2700 - Ord After Hearing... 09/12/2019
3. F276 - Denied without Hearing 09/12/2019
4. MIN - ***Minutes 09/12/2019
5. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 09/12/2019
6. 1520 - Declaration 08/15/2019
7. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 08/15/2019
8. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 08/01/2019
9. 2937 - Ord for Hrg to Ext/Mod/Dis TPO 08/01/2019
10. 4165 - Temporary Protective Order 08/01/2019
11. 1485 - Corrected Judgment or Ord 08/01/2019
12. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 08/01/2019
13. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 07/30/2019
14. 3242 - Ord Setting Hearing 07/30/2019
15. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 07/30/2019
16. DVCIS - Domestic Violence Confidential Information Sheet 07/29/2019
17. 1255 - Application for TPO 07/29/2019
The District Court is comprised of 16 departments. Each Judge sits in a differently numbered Department. When a Judge leaves service, the new Judge's name replaces the former Judge's name on all matters pending and previously closed in that department. This change will not reflect that a previous sitting Judge presided over a matter.