AllPaid Disclaimer Button



Please fill out at least one field before submitting this form.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Detailed Case Information - SC20-2322

Case Description: SC20-2322 - STATE VS. KENDALL LAMONT BIGGERS (ADC)

Filing Date: 03/24/2021

Case Type: XA - ADULT DRUG COURT

Status: Pending Active

Printer Friendly Version

Case Parties

Seq No. Type Name
1 JUDG - Judge RIGGS, TAMMY
2 PLTF - Plaintiff STATE OF NEVADA,
4 DEFT - Defendant BIGGERS, KENDELL LAMONT
5 APD - Alternate Public Defender Chavez, Esq., Wendy
6 DA - District Attorney Hicks, Esq., Nicole

Reference Numbers

No Cross Reference Numbers Available

Event Information

Date/Time Hearing Judge Event Description Outcome
1. 04/22/2021 at 2:00 PM Honorable TAMMY RIGGS H284 - SC-REVIEW HEARING
D330 - SC - Removed from Specialty Crt filed on: 04/22/2021
2. 04/15/2021 at 2:00 PM Honorable TAMMY RIGGS H284 - SC-REVIEW HEARING
D293 - SC - Heard filed on: 04/15/2021
3. 04/08/2021 at 2:00 PM Honorable TAMMY RIGGS H284 - SC-REVIEW HEARING
D802 - Set in Error filed on: 04/01/2021
4. 04/08/2021 at 2:00 PM Honorable TAMMY RIGGS H284 - SC-REVIEW HEARING
D293 - SC - Heard filed on: 04/08/2021
5. 04/01/2021 at 2:00 PM Honorable TAMMY RIGGS H284 - SC-REVIEW HEARING
D280 - SC - B/W Issued No Bail filed on: 04/01/2021
6. 03/25/2021 at 2:00 PM Honorable TAMMY RIGGS H276 - SC-FIRST APPEARANCE
D293 - SC - Heard filed on: 03/25/2021

Docket Entry Information

Docket Description Date Filed
1. 3373 - Other ... 05/04/2021
2. MIN - ***Minutes 05/04/2021
3. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 05/04/2021
4. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 05/04/2021
5. 3947 - Specialty Court Ord Returning Case to Dept (Probation) 04/28/2021
6. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 04/28/2021
7. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 04/19/2021
8. 2700 - Ord After Hearing... 04/19/2021
9. $ADC - **Spec Ct ADC Treatment Fee 04/07/2021
10. 1850 - Judgment of Conviction 03/24/2021
The District Court is comprised of 16 departments. Each Judge sits in a differently numbered Department. When a Judge leaves service, the new Judge's name replaces the former Judge's name on all matters pending and previously closed in that department. This change will not reflect that a previous sitting Judge presided over a matter.