Detailed Case Information - SC18-0112

Case Description: SC18-0112 - STATE VS. LINDSEY CHAE MUHS (ADC)

Filing Date: 03/22/2018

Case Type: XA - ADULT DRUG COURT

Status:

Printer Friendly Version

Case Parties

Seq No. Type Name
2 PLTF - Plaintiff STATE OF NEVADA,
4 DEFT - Defendant MUHS, LINDSEY CHAE
5 APD - Alternate Public Defender Chavez, Esq., Wendy
6 JUDG - Judge RIGGS, TAMMY
7 DA - District Attorney Hicks, Esq., Nicole

Reference Numbers

No Cross Reference Numbers Available

Event Information

Date/Time Hearing Judge Event Description Outcome
1. 03/05/2020 at 4:00 PM Honorable TAMMY RIGGS H280 - SC-Graduation
D284 - SC - Graduated/Prob C. Satisfied filed on: 03/05/2020
2. 02/13/2020 at 4:00 PM Honorable TAMMY RIGGS H284 - SC-REVIEW HEARING
D293 - SC - Heard filed on: 02/13/2020
3. 01/16/2020 at 4:00 PM Honorable TAMMY RIGGS H284 - SC-REVIEW HEARING
D293 - SC - Heard filed on: 01/16/2020
4. 12/19/2019 at 4:00 PM Honorable TAMMY RIGGS H284 - SC-REVIEW HEARING
D293 - SC - Heard filed on: 12/19/2019
5. 11/21/2019 at 4:00 PM Honorable TAMMY RIGGS H284 - SC-REVIEW HEARING
D293 - SC - Heard filed on: 11/21/2019
6. 10/31/2019 at 4:00 PM Honorable TAMMY RIGGS H284 - SC-REVIEW HEARING
D293 - SC - Heard filed on: 10/31/2019
7. 10/03/2019 at 4:00 PM Honorable TAMMY RIGGS H284 - SC-REVIEW HEARING
D293 - SC - Heard filed on: 10/03/2019
8. 09/05/2019 at 4:00 PM Honorable TAMMY RIGGS H284 - SC-REVIEW HEARING
D293 - SC - Heard filed on: 09/05/2019
9. 08/08/2019 at 4:00 PM Honorable TAMMY RIGGS H284 - SC-REVIEW HEARING
D293 - SC - Heard filed on: 08/08/2019
10. 07/11/2019 at 5:00 PM Honorable TAMMY RIGGS H284 - SC-REVIEW HEARING
D293 - SC - Heard filed on: 07/11/2019

Docket Entry Information

Docket Description Date Filed
1. 1850 - Judgment of Conviction 03/22/2018
The District Court is comprised of 16 departments. Each Judge sits in a differently numbered Department. When a Judge leaves service, the new Judge's name replaces the former Judge's name on all matters pending and previously closed in that department. This change will not reflect that a previous sitting Judge presided over a matter.