Detailed Case Information - PR25-00182

Case Description: PR25-00182 - ESTATE: SYLVIAN RUBEN SANDOVAL

Filing Date: 03/04/2025

Case Type: FA - GENERAL ADMINISTRATION

Status: Disposed / Set For Review

Printer Friendly Version

Case Parties

Seq No. Type Name
1 JUDG - Judge GORMAN, PROB. COMM. EDMUND J.
2 DECD - Decedent SANDOVAL, SYLVIAN RUBEN
4 ATTY - Attorney Funk, Esq, John R.
5 PREP - Personal Representative SEELIGER, PAUL

Reference Numbers

No Cross Reference Numbers Available

Event Information

Date/Time Hearing Judge Event Description Outcome
1. 04/09/2025 at 1:00 PM Honorable PROB. COMM. GORMAN HP14 - PET/LETTERS/ADMIN
D425 - Granted filed on: 04/09/2025

Docket Entry Information

Docket Description Date Filed
1. 1768 - General Claim 05/02/2025
2. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 05/02/2025
3. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 04/15/2025
4. MIN - ***Minutes 04/15/2025
5. 1900 - Letters of Administration 04/11/2025
6. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 04/11/2025
7. 1639 - **Document Issued by the Court 04/11/2025
8. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 04/11/2025
9. 2705 - Ord Appointing Administrator 04/11/2025
10. 2595 - Notice to Creditors 04/11/2025
11. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 04/11/2025
12. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 04/11/2025
13. F140 - Adj Summary Judgment 04/11/2025
14. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 04/09/2025
15. 1821 - Instructions for Personal Rep 04/09/2025
16. 1639 - **Document Issued by the Court 04/09/2025
17. 3714 - Proof of Publication of Notice of Hearing 04/03/2025
18. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 04/03/2025
19. 2550 - Notice of Hearing 03/05/2025
20. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 03/05/2025
21. $3557 - $Pet Letters Admin (General Administration) 03/04/2025
22. PAYRC - **Payment Receipted 03/04/2025
The District Court is comprised of 16 departments. Each Judge sits in a differently numbered Department. When a Judge leaves service, the new Judge's name replaces the former Judge's name on all matters pending and previously closed in that department. This change will not reflect that a previous sitting Judge presided over a matter.