Detailed Case Information - MH19-0085

Case Description: MH19-0085 - STATE OF NV VS STEVEN LAFORET (MH)

Filing Date: 10/23/2019

Case Type: MH - MENTAL HEALTH

Status:

Printer Friendly Version

Case Parties

Seq No. Type Name
2 DEFT - Defendant LAFORET, STEVEN MICHAEL
6 PLTF - Plaintiff STATE OF NEVADA,
7 APD - Alternate Public Defender Gearhart, Esq., Dawn
9 DA - District Attorney Ormaas, Esq., Alison M.
11 JUDG - Judge WALKER, EGAN
12 DA - District Attorney Hicks, Esq., Nicole

Reference Numbers

No Cross Reference Numbers Available

Event Information

Date/Time Hearing Judge Event Description Outcome
1. 01/07/2020 at 2:30 PM Honorable TAMMY RIGGS H284 - SC-REVIEW HEARING
D768 - Sentenced Before Trial filed on: 01/07/2020
2. 12/31/2019 at 2:30 PM Honorable TAMMY RIGGS H284 - SC-REVIEW HEARING
D293 - SC - Heard filed on: 12/31/2019
3. 12/10/2019 at 2:30 PM Honorable TAMMY RIGGS H820 - STATUS HEARING
D293 - SC - Heard filed on: 12/10/2019
4. 12/03/2019 at 2:30 PM Honorable TAMMY RIGGS H820 - STATUS HEARING
D802 - Set in Error filed on: 12/02/2019
5. 11/26/2019 at 2:30 PM Honorable TAMMY RIGGS H820 - STATUS HEARING
D293 - SC - Heard filed on: 11/26/2019
6. 11/19/2019 at 2:30 PM Honorable TAMMY RIGGS H820 - STATUS HEARING
D293 - SC - Heard filed on: 11/19/2019
7. 11/12/2019 at 2:30 PM Honorable TAMMY RIGGS H276 - SC-FIRST APPEARANCE
D293 - SC - Heard filed on: 11/12/2019
8. 11/05/2019 at 2:30 PM Honorable TAMMY RIGGS H276 - SC-FIRST APPEARANCE
D293 - SC - Heard filed on: 11/05/2019

Docket Entry Information

Docket Description Date Filed
1. 1850 - Judgment of Conviction 01/13/2020
2. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 01/13/2020
3. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 11/13/2019
4. 4075 - Substitution of Counsel 11/13/2019
5. 6170 - Ord Trans Jurisdiction 11/01/2019
6. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 11/01/2019
7. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 10/30/2019
8. 1931 - Letter Accepting – Specialty Courts 10/30/2019
9. 3951 - Specialty Court Referral Form 10/23/2019
The District Court is comprised of 16 departments. Each Judge sits in a differently numbered Department. When a Judge leaves service, the new Judge's name replaces the former Judge's name on all matters pending and previously closed in that department. This change will not reflect that a previous sitting Judge presided over a matter.