Detailed Case Information - FV25-00411

Case Description: FV25-00411 - CUST: JACQUELYN TOFAUTE VS M. HILLIARD-HEREDIA (D2

Filing Date: 04/02/2025

Case Type: CU - CUSTODY (NON-DIVORCE)

Status: Pending Active

Printer Friendly Version

Case Parties

Seq No. Type Name
1 JUDG - Judge GROSSMAN, DIXIE
2 PETR - Petitioner TOFAUTE, JACQUELYN ANNE
3 RESP - Respondent HILLIARD-HEREDIA, MARCOS

Reference Numbers

No Cross Reference Numbers Available

Event Information

Date/Time Hearing Judge Event Description Outcome
1. 10/15/2025 at 9:00 AM Honorable DIXIE GROSSMAN H185 - CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
- filed on:
2. 08/11/2025 at 12:23 PM Honorable DIXIE GROSSMAN S1 - Request for Submission
S200 - Request for Submission Complet filed on: 08/12/2025
3. 06/10/2025 at 1:00 PM Honorable DIXIE GROSSMAN H185 - CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
D845 - Vacated filed on: 05/20/2025

Docket Entry Information

Docket Description Date Filed
1. 3359 - Ord Waiving Fees and Costs 08/12/2025
2. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 08/12/2025
3. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 08/11/2025
4. 3860 - Request for Submission 08/11/2025
5. 3866 - Request/Waive Fees/Costs 08/11/2025
6. 2523 - Notice of Case Mgt Conference 08/06/2025
7. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 08/06/2025
8. 1067 - Affidavit/Declaration of Service 08/05/2025
9. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 08/05/2025
10. 3330 - Ord to Proceed ... 05/20/2025
11. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 05/20/2025
12. 2523 - Notice of Case Mgt Conference 04/08/2025
13. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 04/08/2025
14. PAYRC - **Payment Receipted 04/03/2025
15. 4090 - ** Summons Issued 04/02/2025
16. 1740 - Financial Declaration ... 04/02/2025
17. $3609 - $Pet/Est Custody & Visitation 04/02/2025
18. FCIS - Family Court Info Sheet 04/02/2025
The District Court is comprised of 16 departments. Each Judge sits in a differently numbered Department. When a Judge leaves service, the new Judge's name replaces the former Judge's name on all matters pending and previously closed in that department. This change will not reflect that a previous sitting Judge presided over a matter.