Detailed Case Information - DV25-01121

Case Description: DV25-01121 - EVA ALICE GULLATT VS DONALD RAY THOMAS JR (D12)

Filing Date: 07/21/2025

Case Type: DO - DIVORCE - WITHOUT CHILDREN

Status: Case Disposed

Case Parties

Seq No. Type Name
2 PLTF - Plaintiff GULLATT, EVA ALICE
3 DEFT - Defendant THOMAS, DONALD RAY
4 JUDG - Judge UNSWORTH, SANDRA

Reference Numbers

No Cross Reference Numbers Available

Event Information

Date/Time Hearing Judge Event Description Outcome
1. 12/08/2025 at 10:30 AM Honorable SANDRA UNSWORTH H185 - CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
D495 - Heard - Settled filed on: 12/08/2025

Docket Entry Information

Docket Description Date Filed
1. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 12/29/2025
2. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 12/29/2025
3. 1540 - Decree of Divorce 12/29/2025
4. 2530 - Notice of Entry of Decree 12/29/2025
5. F255 - Setld/Withdrn with Jud Conf/Hg 12/29/2025
6. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 12/16/2025
7. MIN - ***Minutes 12/16/2025
8. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 12/03/2025
9. 3340 - Ord to Produce Prisoner/Inmate 12/03/2025
10. 3720 - Proof of Service 10/20/2025
11. 2589 - Notice of Stricken Document 10/20/2025
12. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 10/20/2025
13. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 10/20/2025
14. 2523 - Notice of Case Mgt Conference 09/09/2025
15. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 09/09/2025
16. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 09/08/2025
17. 1740 - Financial Declaration ... 09/08/2025
18. 1520 - Declaration 09/08/2025
19. 1435 - Complaint-Divorce No Children 09/08/2025
20. 4090 - ** Summons Issued 09/08/2025
21. FCIS - Family Court Info Sheet 09/08/2025
22. 3866 - Request/Waive Fees/Costs 07/21/2025
23. 3359 - Ord Waiving Fees and Costs 07/21/2025
24. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 07/21/2025
The District Court is comprised of 16 departments. Each Judge sits in a differently numbered Department. When a Judge leaves service, the new Judge's name replaces the former Judge's name on all matters pending and previously closed in that department. This change will not reflect that a previous sitting Judge presided over a matter.