Detailed Case Information - DV25-01023

Case Description: DV25-01023 - JAYDEN HOPPER VS GABRIELLA EPPS (D13)

Filing Date: 07/07/2025

Case Type: DC - DIVORCE - WITH CHILDREN

Status: Pending Active

Printer Friendly Version

Case Parties

Seq No. Type Name
1 JUDG - Judge ROBB, BRIDGET
2 PLTF - Plaintiff HOPPER, JAYDEN HAZE
3 ATTY - Attorney White, Esq., Lance C.
4 DEFT - Defendant EPPS, GABRIELLA DEEN

Reference Numbers

No Cross Reference Numbers Available

Event Information

Date/Time Hearing Judge Event Description Outcome
1. 09/04/2025 at 10:00 AM Honorable BRIDGET ROBB H185 - CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
- filed on:
2. 07/07/2025 at 11:52 AM Honorable BRIDGET ROBB S1 - Request for Submission
S200 - Request for Submission Complet filed on: 07/09/2025

Docket Entry Information

Docket Description Date Filed
1. 2610 - Notice ... 08/06/2025
2. 3720 - Proof of Service 08/06/2025
3. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 08/06/2025
4. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 08/06/2025
5. 3242 - Ord Setting Hearing 07/11/2025
6. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 07/11/2025
7. 1065 - Affidavit of Resident Witness 07/10/2025
8. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 07/10/2025
9. 4170 - Temporary Restraining Order 07/09/2025
10. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 07/09/2025
11. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 07/07/2025
12. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 07/07/2025
13. 3385 - Personal Case Inf. UCCJEA 07/07/2025
14. $1430 - $Complaint - Divorce Children 07/07/2025
15. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 07/07/2025
16. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 07/07/2025
17. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 07/07/2025
18. FCIS - Family Court Info Sheet 07/07/2025
19. PAYRC - **Payment Receipted 07/07/2025
20. 4090 - ** Summons Issued 07/07/2025
21. 3860 - Request for Submission 07/07/2025
The District Court is comprised of 16 departments. Each Judge sits in a differently numbered Department. When a Judge leaves service, the new Judge's name replaces the former Judge's name on all matters pending and previously closed in that department. This change will not reflect that a previous sitting Judge presided over a matter.