Detailed Case Information - DV25-00841

Case Description: DV25-00841 - KORY W. HERZINGER VS ELIZABETH K. HERZINGER (D14)

Filing Date: 06/04/2025

Case Type: DC - DIVORCE - WITH CHILDREN

Status: Pending Active

Printer Friendly Version

Case Parties

Seq No. Type Name
2 PLTF - Plaintiff HERZINGER, KORY WILLIAM
3 ATTY - Attorney Kelly, Esq., Bronagh Mary
4 DEFT - Defendant HERZINGER, ELIZABETH KIMBERLY
5 ATTY - Attorney Mahan, Esq., Bonnie G.
6 JUDG - Judge SCHREINERT, TAMATHA

Reference Numbers

No Cross Reference Numbers Available

Event Information

Date/Time Hearing Judge Event Description Outcome
1. 07/15/2025 at 10:00 AM Honorable CYNTHIA LU H185 - CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
- filed on:
2. 07/01/2025 at 11:20 AM Honorable TAMATHA SCHREINERT S1 - Request for Submission
- filed on:

Docket Entry Information

Docket Description Date Filed
1. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 07/01/2025
2. PAYRC - **Payment Receipted 07/01/2025
3. PAYRC - **Payment Receipted 07/01/2025
4. 1312 - Case Assignment Notification 07/01/2025
5. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 07/01/2025
6. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 07/01/2025
7. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 07/01/2025
8. 3860 - Request for Submission 07/01/2025
9. $3375 - $Peremptory Challenge 07/01/2025
10. 2520 - Notice of Appearance 06/30/2025
11. $1565 - $Def 1st Appearance - DV 06/30/2025
12. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 06/05/2025
13. 2523 - Notice of Case Mgt Conference 06/05/2025
14. FCIS - Family Court Info Sheet 06/04/2025
15. 3385 - Personal Case Inf. UCCJEA 06/04/2025
16. $1430 - $Complaint - Divorce Children 06/04/2025
17. PAYRC - **Payment Receipted 06/04/2025
18. 1065 - Affidavit of Resident Witness 06/04/2025
19. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 06/04/2025
20. 4090 - ** Summons Issued 06/04/2025
The District Court is comprised of 16 departments. Each Judge sits in a differently numbered Department. When a Judge leaves service, the new Judge's name replaces the former Judge's name on all matters pending and previously closed in that department. This change will not reflect that a previous sitting Judge presided over a matter.