Detailed Case Information - DV25-00683

Case Description: DV25-00683 - JOLEE S. TRISTAO VS JASON JOEL TRISTAO (D13)

Filing Date: 05/08/2025

Case Type: JN - JOINT PETITION - NO CHILDREN

Status: Pending Active

Printer Friendly Version

Case Parties

Seq No. Type Name
1 JUDG - Judge ROBB, BRIDGET
2 PLTF - Plaintiff TRISTAO, JOLEE SUE
3 ATTY - Attorney Miller, Esq., Kaitlyn A.
4 DEFT - Defendant TRISTAO, JASON JOEL
5 ATTY - Attorney Albers, Esq., Benjamin
6 ATTY - Attorney Morey, Esq., Alexander C.
7 ATTY - Attorney Kattelman, Esq., Michael V.
8 ATTY - Attorney Springgate, Esq., John P.

Reference Numbers

No Cross Reference Numbers Available

Event Information

Date/Time Hearing Judge Event Description Outcome
1. 07/14/2025 at 10:00 AM Honorable BRIDGET ROBB H185 - CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
- filed on:
2. 06/10/2025 at 4:07 PM Honorable BRIDGET ROBB S1 - Request for Submission
S200 - Request for Submission Complet filed on: 06/16/2025

Docket Entry Information

Docket Description Date Filed
1. 4170 - Temporary Restraining Order 06/16/2025
2. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 06/16/2025
3. 3860 - Request for Submission 06/10/2025
4. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 06/10/2025
5. PAYRC - **Payment Receipted 06/02/2025
6. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 06/02/2025
7. $1565 - $Def 1st Appearance - DV 06/02/2025
8. 1130 - Answer ... 06/02/2025
9. 3370 - Order ... 05/13/2025
10. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 05/13/2025
11. $1435 - $Complaint-Divorce No Children 05/08/2025
12. 1521 - Declaration of Resident Witness 05/08/2025
13. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 05/08/2025
14. 2523 - Notice of Case Mgt Conference 05/08/2025
15. 4090 - ** Summons Issued 05/08/2025
16. PAYRC - **Payment Receipted 05/08/2025
17. FCIS - Family Court Info Sheet 05/08/2025
The District Court is comprised of 16 departments. Each Judge sits in a differently numbered Department. When a Judge leaves service, the new Judge's name replaces the former Judge's name on all matters pending and previously closed in that department. This change will not reflect that a previous sitting Judge presided over a matter.