Detailed Case Information - DV25-00155

Case Description: DV25-00155 - ANUL: KIMBERLY GARCIA VS FEDERICO M. GARCIA (D14)

Filing Date: 01/29/2025

Case Type: AN - ANNULMENT

Status: Pending Active

Printer Friendly Version

Case Parties

Seq No. Type Name
2 PLTF - Plaintiff GARCIA, KIMBERLY
3 ATTY - Attorney Tzall, Esq., Robert
4 DEFT - Defendant MARROQUIN GARCIA, FEDERICO
5 JUDG - Judge SCHREINERT, TAMATHA

Reference Numbers

No Cross Reference Numbers Available

Event Information

Date/Time Hearing Judge Event Description Outcome
1. 06/30/2025 at 9:30 AM Honorable TAMATHA SCHREINERT H776 - PROVE UP HEARING
- filed on:
2. 04/10/2025 at 12:13 PM Honorable TAMATHA SCHREINERT S1 - Request for Submission
S200 - Request for Submission Complet filed on: 05/16/2025

Docket Entry Information

Docket Description Date Filed
1. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 06/05/2025
2. 2610 - Notice ... 06/05/2025
3. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 06/02/2025
4. FIE - **Document Filed in Error 06/02/2025
5. 2550 - Notice of Hearing 05/21/2025
6. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 05/21/2025
7. 3242 - Ord Setting Hearing 05/16/2025
8. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 05/16/2025
9. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 05/02/2025
10. 1521 - Declaration of Resident Witness 05/02/2025
11. 1220 - Application for Default 04/10/2025
12. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 04/10/2025
13. 3860 - Request for Submission 04/10/2025
14. 3330 - Ord to Proceed ... 03/19/2025
15. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 03/19/2025
16. 1067 - Affidavit/Declaration of Service 02/12/2025
17. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 02/12/2025
18. PAYRC - **Payment Receipted 01/30/2025
19. 4090 - ** Summons Issued 01/29/2025
20. FCIS - Family Court Info Sheet 01/29/2025
21. $3425 - $Pet for Annulment 01/29/2025
The District Court is comprised of 16 departments. Each Judge sits in a differently numbered Department. When a Judge leaves service, the new Judge's name replaces the former Judge's name on all matters pending and previously closed in that department. This change will not reflect that a previous sitting Judge presided over a matter.