Detailed Case Information - DV25-00126

Case Description: DV25-00126 - SHAYLA CASBARRO VS AUSTIN CASBARRO (D13)

Filing Date: 01/25/2025

Case Type: DO - DIVORCE - WITHOUT CHILDREN

Status: Pending Active

Printer Friendly Version

Case Parties

Seq No. Type Name
1 JUDG - Judge ROBB, BRIDGET
2 PLTF - Plaintiff CASBARRO, SHAYLA MARIE
3 DEFT - Defendant CASBARRO, AUSTIN

Reference Numbers

No Cross Reference Numbers Available

Event Information

Date/Time Hearing Judge Event Description Outcome
1. 04/25/2025 at 10:49 AM Honorable BRIDGET ROBB S1 - Request for Submission
S200 - Request for Submission Complet filed on: 05/06/2025
2. 03/27/2025 at 10:00 AM Honorable BRIDGET ROBB H185 - CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
D880 - Vacated - No Proof of Service filed on: 03/06/2025

Docket Entry Information

Docket Description Date Filed
1. 2965 - Ord for Publication 05/06/2025
2. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 05/06/2025
3. 3860 - Request for Submission 04/25/2025
4. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 04/25/2025
5. 3330 - Ord to Proceed ... 04/17/2025
6. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 04/17/2025
7. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 03/31/2025
8. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 03/06/2025
9. 3366 - Ord Vacating 03/06/2025
10. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 02/19/2025
11. 2610 - Notice ... 02/14/2025
12. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 02/14/2025
13. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 02/11/2025
14. 3242 - Ord Setting Hearing 01/31/2025
15. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 01/31/2025
16. PAYRC - **Payment Receipted 01/27/2025
17. FCIS - Family Court Info Sheet 01/25/2025
18. 1740 - Financial Declaration ... 01/25/2025
19. 4090 - ** Summons Issued 01/25/2025
20. 1521 - Declaration of Resident Witness 01/25/2025
21. $1435 - $Complaint-Divorce No Children 01/25/2025
The District Court is comprised of 16 departments. Each Judge sits in a differently numbered Department. When a Judge leaves service, the new Judge's name replaces the former Judge's name on all matters pending and previously closed in that department. This change will not reflect that a previous sitting Judge presided over a matter.