Detailed Case Information - DV22-01465

Case Description: DV22-01465 - MICHAEL E. WRIGHT VS BROOKE R. WRIGHT (D13)

Filing Date: 09/23/2022

Case Type: DO - DIVORCE - WITHOUT CHILDREN

Status: Case Disposed

Printer Friendly Version

Case Parties

Seq No. Type Name
2 PLTF - Plaintiff WRIGHT, MICHAEL EUGENE
3 DEFT - Defendant WRIGHT, BROOKE RAMONA
4 JUDG - Judge ROBB, BRIDGET

Reference Numbers

No Cross Reference Numbers Available

Event Information

Date/Time Hearing Judge Event Description Outcome
1. 02/06/2023 at 10:00 AM Honorable BRIDGET ROBB H185 - CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
D850 - Vacated - Counsel filed on: 01/20/2023
2. 09/23/2022 at 2:04 PM Honorable BRIDGET ROBB S1 - Request for Submission
S200 - Request for Submission Complet filed on: 09/29/2022

Docket Entry Information

Docket Description Date Filed
1. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 03/17/2023
2. 2915 - Ord Dismissal w/o Prejudice 03/17/2023
3. F230 - Other Manner of Disposition 03/17/2023
4. 3366 - Ord Vacating 01/20/2023
5. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 01/20/2023
6. 3370 - Order ... 01/05/2023
7. 2610 - Notice ... 01/05/2023
8. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 01/05/2023
9. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 01/05/2023
10. 3242 - Ord Setting Hearing 11/03/2022
11. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 11/03/2022
12. 1521 - Declaration of Resident Witness 10/12/2022
13. 4090 - ** Summons Issued 10/12/2022
14. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 10/12/2022
15. 1740 - Financial Declaration ... 10/12/2022
16. 1435 - Complaint-Divorce No Children 10/12/2022
17. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 09/29/2022
18. 3359 - Ord Waiving Fees and Costs 09/29/2022
19. 3860 - Request for Submission 09/23/2022
20. 3866 - Request/Waive Fees/Costs 09/23/2022
21. FCIS - Family Court Info Sheet 09/23/2022
The District Court is comprised of 16 departments. Each Judge sits in a differently numbered Department. When a Judge leaves service, the new Judge's name replaces the former Judge's name on all matters pending and previously closed in that department. This change will not reflect that a previous sitting Judge presided over a matter.