Detailed Case Information - DV21-01203

Case Description: DV21-01203 - GINELE COUOH VS AUSTIN P. GRAHAM (D14)

Filing Date: 08/18/2021

Case Type: DC - DIVORCE - WITH CHILDREN

Status: Case Disposed

Printer Friendly Version

Case Parties

Seq No. Type Name
1 JUDG - Judge SCHREINERT, TAMATHA
2 PLTF - Plaintiff COUOH, GINELE
3 DEFT - Defendant GRAHAM, AUSTIN PAUL

Reference Numbers

No Cross Reference Numbers Available

Event Information

Date/Time Hearing Judge Event Description Outcome
1. 05/23/2022 at 3:30 PM Honorable TAMATHA SCHREINERT H185 - CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
D435 - Heard ... filed on: 05/23/2022
2. 08/18/2021 at 3:53 PM Honorable TAMATHA SCHREINERT S1 - Request for Submission
S200 - Request for Submission Complet filed on: 08/18/2021

Docket Entry Information

Docket Description Date Filed
1. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 04/21/2023
2. F240 - Involuntary Dismissal 04/21/2023
3. 2915 - Ord Dismissal w/o Prejudice 04/21/2023
4. 3330 - Ord to Proceed ... 06/02/2022
5. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 06/02/2022
6. MIN - ***Minutes 05/24/2022
7. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 05/24/2022
8. 2523 - Notice of Case Mgt Conference 02/14/2022
9. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 02/14/2022
10. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 11/04/2021
11. 1520 - Declaration 11/04/2021
12. FCIS - Family Court Info Sheet 09/16/2021
13. 1740 - Financial Declaration ... 09/16/2021
14. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 09/16/2021
15. 1430 - Complaint - Divorce Children 09/16/2021
16. 4090 - ** Summons Issued 09/16/2021
17. 1521 - Declaration of Resident Witness 09/16/2021
18. 3866 - Request/Waive Fees/Costs 08/18/2021
19. 3359 - Ord Waiving Fees and Costs 08/18/2021
20. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 08/18/2021
21. 3860 - Request for Submission 08/18/2021
The District Court is comprised of 16 departments. Each Judge sits in a differently numbered Department. When a Judge leaves service, the new Judge's name replaces the former Judge's name on all matters pending and previously closed in that department. This change will not reflect that a previous sitting Judge presided over a matter.