Detailed Case Information - DV21-00146

Case Description: DV21-00146 - AMANDA A. STAFFORD VS. JOSEPH D. STAFFORD (D5)

Filing Date: 01/29/2021

Case Type: DC - DIVORCE - WITH CHILDREN

Status: Case Disposed

Printer Friendly Version

Case Parties

Seq No. Type Name
1 JUDG - Judge LU, CYNTHIA
2 DEFT - Defendant STAFFORD, JOSEPH DONALD
3 PLTF - Plaintiff STAFFORD, AMANDA ALICIA

Reference Numbers

No Cross Reference Numbers Available

Event Information

Date/Time Hearing Judge Event Description Outcome
1. 04/27/2021 at 9:00 AM Honorable CYNTHIA LU H185 - CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
D640 - Ord Entered filed on: 04/27/2021

Docket Entry Information

Docket Description Date Filed
1. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 04/28/2021
2. F255 - Setld/Withdrn with Jud Conf/Hg 04/28/2021
3. 1540 - Decree of Divorce 04/28/2021
4. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 04/28/2021
5. 2530 - Notice of Entry of Decree 04/28/2021
6. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 04/27/2021
7. 1550 - Default 04/27/2021
8. MIN - ***Minutes 04/27/2021
9. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 04/27/2021
10. 2550 - Notice of Hearing 04/22/2021
11. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 04/22/2021
12. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 04/06/2021
13. 1520 - Declaration 04/06/2021
14. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 03/25/2021
15. 1740 - Financial Declaration ... 03/25/2021
16. 4090 - ** Summons Issued 03/25/2021
17. 1521 - Declaration of Resident Witness 03/25/2021
18. 1637 - Divorce Case Mgt Conf Statmnt 03/15/2021
19. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 03/15/2021
20. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 02/23/2021
21. 2523 - Notice of Case Mgt Conference 02/23/2021
22. PAYRC - **Payment Receipted 02/04/2021
23. $1430 - $Complaint - Divorce Children 02/04/2021
24. 1430 - Complaint - Divorce Children 01/29/2021
The District Court is comprised of 16 departments. Each Judge sits in a differently numbered Department. When a Judge leaves service, the new Judge's name replaces the former Judge's name on all matters pending and previously closed in that department. This change will not reflect that a previous sitting Judge presided over a matter.