AllPaid Disclaimer Button



Please fill out at least one field before submitting this form.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Detailed Case Information - DV17-02111

Case Description: DV17-02111 - JASON ALLISATT VS THATA JACKSON (D2)

Filing Date: 12/11/2017

Case Type: DO - DIVORCE - WITHOUT CHILDREN

Status: Case Disposed

Printer Friendly Version

Case Parties

Seq No. Type Name
2 DEFT - Defendant JACKSON, THATA
3 PLTF - Plaintiff ALLISATT, JASON ANDREW
5 JUDG - Judge GROSSMAN, DIXIE

Reference Numbers

No Cross Reference Numbers Available

Event Information

Date/Time Hearing Judge Event Description Outcome
1. 04/04/2018 at 3:00 PM Honorable DIXIE GROSSMAN H185 - CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
D385 - Dismissed filed on: 04/09/2018
2. 12/11/2017 at 11:17 AM Honorable CYNTHIA LU S1 - Request for Submission
S200 - Request for Submission Complet filed on: 12/11/2017

Docket Entry Information

Docket Description Date Filed
1. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 04/09/2018
2. MIN - ***Minutes 04/09/2018
3. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 04/05/2018
4. 2700 - Ord After Hearing... 04/05/2018
5. F250 - Setld/Withdrn w/o Jud Conf/Hrg 04/05/2018
6. 4085 - Summons Filed 12/13/2017
7. 4090 - ** Summons Issued 12/11/2017
8. 1435 - Complaint-Divorce No Children 12/11/2017
9. 1521 - Declaration of Resident Witness 12/11/2017
10. 1740 - Financial Declaration ... 12/11/2017
11. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 12/11/2017
12. 2523E - Notice of Case Mgt Conference 12/11/2017
13. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 12/11/2017
14. 3359 - Ord Waiving Fees and Costs 12/11/2017
15. 3860 - Request for Submission 12/11/2017
16. FCIS - Family Court Info Sheet 12/11/2017
17. 3866 - Request/Waive Fees/Costs 12/11/2017
The District Court is comprised of 16 departments. Each Judge sits in a differently numbered Department. When a Judge leaves service, the new Judge's name replaces the former Judge's name on all matters pending and previously closed in that department. This change will not reflect that a previous sitting Judge presided over a matter.