Detailed Case Information - CV25-02309

Case Description: CV25-02309 - R. CAPPUCCI ET AL VS MAUPIN COX & LEGOY ET AL (15)

Filing Date: 09/24/2025

Case Type: IM - INTENTIONAL MISCONDUCT

Status: Pending Active

Printer Friendly Version

Case Parties

Seq No. Type Name
1 JUDG - Judge HARDY, DAVID A.
2 PLTF - Plaintiff BERNDT, DIETER
3 PLTF - Plaintiff CAPPUCCI, RAFAEL
4 DEFT - Defendant MAUPIN, COX & LEGOY,
5 DEFT - Defendant STANKO, CHRISTOPHER M.
6 DEFT - Defendant RAFFERTY, MICHAELLE D.
7 DEFT - Defendant KRZANOWSKI, EDWARD F.
8 ATTY - Attorney Beko, Esq., Thomas P.
9 ATTY - Attorney Bertone, Esq., Paul M.

Reference Numbers

No Cross Reference Numbers Available

Event Information

Date/Time Hearing Judge Event Description Outcome
1. 11/05/2025 at 11:00 AM Honorable DAVID HARDY H640 - ORAL ARGUMENTS
- filed on:
2. 10/22/2025 at 6:10 AM Honorable DAVID HARDY S1 - Request for Submission
- filed on:

Docket Entry Information

Docket Description Date Filed
1. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 10/30/2025
2. 3242 - Ord Setting Hearing 10/30/2025
3. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 10/29/2025
4. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 10/29/2025
5. 2645 - Opposition to Mtn ... 10/29/2025
6. 2610 - Notice ... 10/29/2025
7. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 10/29/2025
8. 2610 - Notice ... 10/29/2025
9. 3860 - Request for Submission 10/22/2025
10. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 10/22/2025
11. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 10/21/2025
12. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 10/21/2025
13. 2589 - Notice of Stricken Document 10/21/2025
14. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 10/21/2025
15. 3860 - Request for Submission 10/21/2025
16. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 10/21/2025
17. 2589 - Notice of Stricken Document 10/21/2025
18. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 10/21/2025
19. 3860 - Request for Submission 10/21/2025
20. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 10/21/2025
21. 2645 - Opposition to Mtn ... 10/21/2025
22. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 10/21/2025
23. 2589 - Notice of Stricken Document 10/21/2025
24. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 10/21/2025
25. 3860 - Request for Submission 10/21/2025
26. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 10/21/2025
27. 2589 - Notice of Stricken Document 10/21/2025
28. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 10/21/2025
29. 3867 - Request to Amend Order 10/21/2025
30. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 10/21/2025
31. 2610 - Notice ... 10/21/2025
32. 3720 - Proof of Service 10/21/2025
33. 3373 - Other ... 10/21/2025
34. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 10/21/2025
35. PAYRC - **Payment Receipted 10/21/2025
36. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 10/21/2025
37. 2589 - Notice of Stricken Document 10/21/2025
38. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 10/21/2025
39. 3860 - Request for Submission 10/21/2025
40. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 10/21/2025
41. 2589 - Notice of Stricken Document 10/21/2025
42. 3373 - Other ... 10/21/2025
43. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 10/21/2025
44. 2589 - Notice of Stricken Document 10/21/2025
45. 2305 - Mtn Dismiss with Prejudice 10/20/2025
46. $1560 - $Def 1st Appearance - CV 10/20/2025
47. $DEFT - $Addl Def/Answer - Prty/Appear 10/20/2025
48. $DEFT - $Addl Def/Answer - Prty/Appear 10/20/2025
49. $DEFT - $Addl Def/Answer - Prty/Appear 10/20/2025
50. 3720 - Proof of Service 10/06/2025
51. 3720 - Proof of Service 10/06/2025
52. 3720 - Proof of Service 10/06/2025
53. 3720 - Proof of Service 10/06/2025
54. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 10/06/2025
55. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 09/30/2025
56. 2842 - Ord Denying Motion 09/30/2025
57. 4090 - ** Summons Issued 09/24/2025
58. $PLTF - $Addl Plaintiff/Complaint 09/24/2025
59. 4090 - ** Summons Issued 09/24/2025
60. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 09/24/2025
61. $1425 - $Complaint - Civil 09/24/2025
62. PAYRC - **Payment Receipted 09/24/2025
63. 4090 - ** Summons Issued 09/24/2025
64. 4090 - ** Summons Issued 09/24/2025
The District Court is comprised of 16 departments. Each Judge sits in a differently numbered Department. When a Judge leaves service, the new Judge's name replaces the former Judge's name on all matters pending and previously closed in that department. This change will not reflect that a previous sitting Judge presided over a matter.