Detailed Case Information - CV25-02210

Case Description: CV25-02210 - SARAH OVERLY VS ERICKSON OB/GYN ASSOC (D9)

Filing Date: 09/12/2025

Case Type: NO - OTHER NEGLIGENCE

Status: Pending Active

Printer Friendly Version

Case Parties

Seq No. Type Name
1 JUDG - Judge FREEMAN, SCOTT N.
2 PLTF - Plaintiff OVERLY, SARAH
3 ATTY - Attorney Ring, Esq., Nathan R.
4 DEFT - Defendant ERICKSON-OB-GYN ASSOC., LTD.,
6 ATTY - Attorney Lowry, Esq., Michael P

Reference Numbers

No Cross Reference Numbers Available

Event Information

Date/Time Hearing Judge Event Description Outcome
1. 12/12/2025 at 4:03 PM Honorable SCOTT FREEMAN S1 - Request for Submission
- filed on:

Docket Entry Information

Docket Description Date Filed
1. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 12/12/2025
2. 3860 - Request for Submission 12/12/2025
3. $1560 - $Def 1st Appearance - CV 12/04/2025
4. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 12/04/2025
5. 2490 - Motion ... 12/04/2025
6. PAYRC - **Payment Receipted 12/04/2025
7. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 12/04/2025
8. 2520 - Notice of Appearance 12/04/2025
9. 2490 - Motion ... 12/03/2025
10. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 12/03/2025
11. 2275 - Mtn to Consolidate 11/21/2025
12. 1955 - Memorandum Points&Authorities 11/21/2025
13. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 11/21/2025
14. 1520 - Declaration 11/21/2025
15. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 10/06/2025
16. JF - **First Day Jury Fees Deposit 10/06/2025
17. 1580 - Demand for Jury 10/06/2025
18. PAYRC - **Payment Receipted 10/06/2025
19. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 09/22/2025
20. 1067 - Affidavit/Declaration of Service 09/22/2025
21. 4090 - ** Summons Issued 09/12/2025
22. $1425 - $Complaint - Civil 09/12/2025
23. COV - **Civil Cover Sheet 09/12/2025
24. PAYRC - **Payment Receipted 09/12/2025
The District Court is comprised of 16 departments. Each Judge sits in a differently numbered Department. When a Judge leaves service, the new Judge's name replaces the former Judge's name on all matters pending and previously closed in that department. This change will not reflect that a previous sitting Judge presided over a matter.