AllPaid Disclaimer Button



Please fill out at least one field before submitting this form.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Detailed Case Information - CV25-01953

Case Description: CV25-01953 - CITY OF SPARKS ETAL VS DANIEL SCOTT SMITH (D10)

Filing Date: 08/14/2025

Case Type: GC - OTHER CIVIL MATTERS

Status: Pending Active

Printer Friendly Version

Case Parties

Seq No. Type Name
1 JUDG - Judge SIGURDSON, KATHLEEN
2 PLTF - Plaintiff CITY OF SPARKS,
3 PLTF - Plaintiff SPARKS POLICE DEPARTMENT,
4 CA - City Attorney Northington, Esq., Mariah
5 CA - City Attorney Duncan, Esq., Wesley K.
6 DEFT - Defendant SMITH, DANIEL SCOTT
7 CA - City Attorney Sendall, Esq., Brandon C.

Reference Numbers

No Cross Reference Numbers Available

Event Information

Date/Time Hearing Judge Event Description Outcome
1. 09/17/2025 at 9:14 AM Honorable KATHLEEN SIGURDSON S1 - Request for Submission
- filed on:

Docket Entry Information

Docket Description Date Filed
1. 3860 - Request for Submission 09/17/2025
2. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 09/17/2025
3. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 09/17/2025
4. 2589 - Notice of Stricken Document 09/17/2025
5. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 09/16/2025
6. 1225 - Application Default Judgment 09/16/2025
7. 3860 - Request for Submission 09/16/2025
8. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 09/16/2025
9. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 09/11/2025
10. 1550 - Default 09/11/2025
11. 2520 - Notice of Appearance 09/11/2025
12. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 09/11/2025
13. 1639 - **Document Issued by the Court 09/11/2025
14. 1220 - Application for Default 09/11/2025
15. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 09/11/2025
16. 4085 - Summons Filed 08/25/2025
17. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 08/25/2025
18. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 08/14/2025
19. 4090 - ** Summons Issued 08/14/2025
20. 1440 - Complaint for Forfeiture 08/14/2025
The District Court is comprised of 16 departments. Each Judge sits in a differently numbered Department. When a Judge leaves service, the new Judge's name replaces the former Judge's name on all matters pending and previously closed in that department. This change will not reflect that a previous sitting Judge presided over a matter.