Detailed Case Information - CV19-01856

Case Description: CV19-01856 - IN RE: JOEY BIGGS (D6)

Filing Date: 09/23/2019

Case Type: MT - MENTAL COMPETENCY - CIVIL

Status: Case Disposed

Printer Friendly Version

Case Parties

Seq No. Type Name
2 DEFT - Defendant BIGGS, JOEY
4 PLTF - Plaintiff STATE OF NEVADA,
5 JUDG - Judge JONES, LYNNE K.
6 PD - Public Defender Correlli, Esq., Melinda
8 DA - District Attorney Kossow, Esq., Kelly Ann
9 PD - Public Defender Fahrendorf, Esq., Scott

Reference Numbers

Reference Number
1. DA1911651
2. RCR2019104125

Event Information

Date/Time Hearing Judge Event Description Outcome
1. 02/12/2020 at 9:00 AM Honorable LYNNE JONES H780 - REPORT PSYCHIATRIC EVALUATION
D412 - Found Competent Returned to JC filed on: 02/12/2020
2. 11/13/2019 at 9:00 AM Honorable LYNNE JONES H780 - REPORT PSYCHIATRIC EVALUATION
D415 - Found Incompetent - Remanded to Competency Treatment filed on: 11/13/2019

Docket Entry Information

Docket Description Date Filed
1. MIN - ***Minutes 02/14/2020
2. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 02/14/2020
3. F230 - Other Manner of Disposition 02/13/2020
4. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 02/12/2020
5. 2968 - Ord of Competency/Return JC 02/12/2020
6. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 02/07/2020
7. 4505 - Crt Ord Psych Eval - Conf. 02/07/2020
8. MIN - ***Minutes 11/26/2019
9. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 11/26/2019
10. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 11/15/2019
11. 3201 - Ord Remanding ... 11/15/2019
12. 3937 - SJDC Hearing 11/08/2019
13. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 11/08/2019
14. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 10/30/2019
15. 4505 - Crt Ord Psych Eval - Conf. 10/30/2019
16. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 10/29/2019
17. 4505 - Crt Ord Psych Eval - Conf. 10/29/2019
18. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 09/24/2019
19. 1491 - Pretrl Srvcs Assessment Report 09/24/2019
20. 2587 - Notice of Setting 09/23/2019
21. 3700 - Proceedings 09/23/2019
22. 2610 - Notice ... 09/23/2019
23. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 09/23/2019
The District Court is comprised of 16 departments. Each Judge sits in a differently numbered Department. When a Judge leaves service, the new Judge's name replaces the former Judge's name on all matters pending and previously closed in that department. This change will not reflect that a previous sitting Judge presided over a matter.