Please fill out at least one field before submitting this form.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Detailed Case Information - CV08-00922

Case Description: CV08-00922 - IN RE: BLAKE CARRANZA (D6)

Filing Date: 04/09/2008

Case Type: CM - COMPROMISE OF MINOR'S CLAIM

Status: Case Disposed

Printer Friendly Version

Case Parties - Click to expand

Case Parties

Seq No. Type Name
1 JUDG - Judge JONES, LYNNE K.
2 MINR - Minor CARRANZA, BLAKE
3 PETR - Petitioner CARRANZA-VIVEROS, RICARDO
4 ATTY - Attorney Kane, Esq., Harry N.
5 ATTY - Attorney Kane, Esq., Harry N.

Cross Reference Number(s) - Click to expand

Reference Numbers

No Cross Reference Numbers Available

Event Information - Click to expand

Event Information

Date/Time Hearing Judge Event Description Outcome
1. 03/13/2020 at 10:00 AM Honorable LYNNE JONES H644 - ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
D845 - Vacated filed on: 03/12/2020
Extra Text: FUNDS RELEASED.

Docket Entry Information - Click to expand

Docket Entry Information

Docket Description Date Filed Extra Text
1. F230 - Other Manner of Disposition 03/12/2020 Extra Text:
2. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 02/10/2020 Extra Text: Transaction 7730254 - Approved By: NOREVIEW : 02-10-2020:08:49:46
3. 3320 - Ord to File ... 02/10/2020 Extra Text: Transaction 7730236 - Approved By: NOREVIEW : 02-10-2020:08:47:33
4. 3710 - Proof Blocked Trust Account 06/03/2008 Extra Text: PROOF OF COMPLIANCE
5. 2760 - Ord Approve Minor's Claim 05/08/2008 Extra Text:
6. 1315 - ** Case Closed 05/08/2008 Extra Text:
7. 3370 - Order ... 04/17/2008 Extra Text: DENYING PETITION FOR COMPROMISE OF MINOR'S CLAIM
8. 3510 - Pet Compromise Minor's Claim 04/09/2008 Extra Text:
9. COV - **Civil Cover Sheet 04/09/2008 Extra Text:
The District Court is comprised of 16 departments. Each Judge sits in a differently numbered Department. When a Judge leaves service, the new Judge's name replaces the former Judge's name on all matters pending and previously closed in that department. This change will not reflect that a previous sitting Judge presided over a matter.