Detailed Case Information - CR25-1889

Case Description: CR25-1889 - STATE VS CODY MITCHELL ELMS (D9)

Filing Date: 08/05/2025

Case Type: CR - CRIMINAL

Status: Pending Active

Printer Friendly Version

Case Parties

Seq No. Type Name
1 JUDG - Judge FREEMAN, SCOTT N.
2 PLTF - Plaintiff STATE OF NEVADA,
4 DEFT - Defendant ELMS, CODY MITCHELL
5 DA - District Attorney Garcia, Esq., Jenna L.
6 PD - Public Defender Nguyen Esq., Justin
7 PNP - Parole & Probation Parole & Probation, Div. of

Reference Numbers

Reference Number
1. DA0359149
2. PCNRPD0129436C
3. RCR2025132099
4. RPDRP25015085

Event Information

Date/Time Hearing Judge Event Description Outcome
1. 11/24/2025 at 9:00 AM Honorable SCOTT FREEMAN H808 - SENTENCING
- filed on:
2. 09/08/2025 at 9:00 AM Honorable SCOTT FREEMAN H160 - ARRAIGNMENT
D655 - Pled Guilty filed on: 09/08/2025

Docket Entry Information

Docket Description Date Filed
1. 1652 - Evaluations 09/18/2025
2. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 09/18/2025
3. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 09/09/2025
4. 4185 - Transcript 09/09/2025
5. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 09/08/2025
6. 1785 - Guilty Plea Memo/Agreement 09/08/2025
7. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 09/04/2025
8. 3706 - Pretrial Court Note 09/04/2025
9. 1800 - Information 08/21/2025
10. 4265 - Waiver of Preliminary Exam 08/21/2025
11. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 08/21/2025
12. 3870 - Request 08/21/2025
13. 1491 - Pretrl Srvcs Assessment Report 08/14/2025
14. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 08/14/2025
15. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 08/13/2025
16. 2587 - Notice of Setting 08/13/2025
17. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 08/13/2025
18. 3700 - Proceedings 08/12/2025
19. 2522 - Notice of Bindover 08/12/2025
20. 3843 - Request for Early Case Assignment 08/05/2025
The District Court is comprised of 16 departments. Each Judge sits in a differently numbered Department. When a Judge leaves service, the new Judge's name replaces the former Judge's name on all matters pending and previously closed in that department. This change will not reflect that a previous sitting Judge presided over a matter.