Detailed Case Information - CR24-2230

Case Description: CR24-2230 - STATE VS. BRIAN ADAM GOHL (TN)(D3)

Filing Date: 09/30/2024

Case Type: CR - CRIMINAL

Status: Pending Active

Printer Friendly Version

Case Parties

Seq No. Type Name
2 PLTF - Plaintiff STATE OF NEVADA,
4 DEFT - Defendant GOHL (TN), BRIAN ADAM
5 JUDG - Judge RIGGS, TAMMY
6 DA - District Attorney Chesterfield, Esq., Rachael L.
7 APD - Alternate Public Defender Hutt, Esq., Sydney McBride
8 PNP - Parole & Probation Parole & Probation, Div. of

Reference Numbers

Reference Number
1. DA0348059
2. PCNRPD0127237C
3. RCR2024128562
4. RPDRP24109515

Event Information

Date/Time Hearing Judge Event Description Outcome
1. 04/28/2025 at 9:00 AM Honorable TAMMY RIGGS H808 - SENTENCING
- filed on:
2. 03/10/2025 at 9:00 AM Honorable TAMMY RIGGS H160 - ARRAIGNMENT
D655 - Pled Guilty filed on: 03/10/2025

Docket Entry Information

Docket Description Date Filed
1. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 04/22/2025
2. 4500 - PSI - Confidential 04/22/2025
3. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 04/21/2025
4. 1930 - Letters ... 04/21/2025
5. 1785 - Guilty Plea Memo/Agreement 03/10/2025
6. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 03/10/2025
7. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 03/10/2025
8. MIN - ***Minutes 03/10/2025
9. 3706 - Pretrial Court Note 03/05/2025
10. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 03/05/2025
11. 1800 - Information 02/27/2025
12. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 02/27/2025
13. 1491 - Pretrl Srvcs Assessment Report 02/27/2025
14. 3870 - Request 02/27/2025
15. 2610 - Notice ... 02/27/2025
16. 4265 - Waiver of Preliminary Exam 02/27/2025
17. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 02/27/2025
18. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 02/26/2025
19. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 02/26/2025
20. 2587 - Notice of Setting 02/26/2025
21. 3700 - Proceedings 02/25/2025
22. 2522 - Notice of Bindover 02/25/2025
23. 3843 - Request for Early Case Assignment 09/30/2024
The District Court is comprised of 16 departments. Each Judge sits in a differently numbered Department. When a Judge leaves service, the new Judge's name replaces the former Judge's name on all matters pending and previously closed in that department. This change will not reflect that a previous sitting Judge presided over a matter.