Detailed Case Information - CR21-1128

Case Description: CR21-1128 - STATE VS. CHRISTOPHER NORMAN BARR-VANDEGRIFT (D4)

Filing Date: 04/08/2021

Case Type: CR - CRIMINAL

Status: Case Disposed

Printer Friendly Version

Case Parties

Seq No. Type Name
1 JUDG - Judge STEINHEIMER, CONNIE J.
2 DEFT - Defendant BARR-VANDEGRIFT (TN), CHRISTOPHER NORMAN
5 PLTF - Plaintiff STATE OF NEVADA,
6 PNP - Parole & Probation Parole & Probation, Div. of
9 DA - District Attorney Bolenbaker, Esq., Michael
12 DA - District Attorney Valencia, Esq., Lorena
13 PD - Public Defender Riley, Esq., Ryndan

Reference Numbers

Reference Number
1. 14SCR00538
2. DA148604
3. SPD128556

Event Information

Date/Time Hearing Judge Event Description Outcome
1. 07/18/2024 at 9:00 AM Honorable CONNIE STEINHEIMER H820 - STATUS HEARING
D470 - Heard - Modified filed on: 07/18/2024
2. 05/25/2021 at 9:00 AM Honorable CONNIE STEINHEIMER H808 - SENTENCING
D765 - Sentenced filed on: 05/25/2021
3. 04/20/2021 at 9:00 AM Honorable CONNIE STEINHEIMER H160 - ARRAIGNMENT
D655 - Pled Guilty filed on: 04/20/2021

Docket Entry Information

Docket Description Date Filed
1. MIN - ***Minutes 07/30/2024
2. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 07/30/2024
3. 1850 - Judgment of Conviction 07/19/2024
4. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 07/19/2024
5. 4075 - Substitution of Counsel 07/17/2024
6. 4270 - Waiver of Appearance 07/17/2024
7. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 07/17/2024
8. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 07/17/2024
9. 4075 - Substitution of Counsel 06/18/2024
10. 2589 - Notice of Stricken Document 06/18/2024
11. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 06/18/2024
12. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 06/18/2024
13. 4075 - Substitution of Counsel 06/17/2024
14. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 06/17/2024
15. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 06/14/2024
16. 2587 - Notice of Setting 06/14/2024
17. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 12/11/2021
18. 4185 - Transcript 12/11/2021
19. 4185 - Transcript 10/08/2021
20. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 10/08/2021
21. MIN - ***Minutes 08/30/2021
22. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 08/30/2021
23. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 08/25/2021
24. MIN - ***Minutes 08/25/2021
25. 1860 - Judgment Conviction-Corrected 06/17/2021
26. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 06/17/2021
27. 1860 - Judgment Conviction-Corrected 06/16/2021
28. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 06/16/2021
29. 1850 - Judgment of Conviction 05/25/2021
30. COLL - Sent to Collections 05/25/2021
31. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 05/25/2021
32. 4505 - Crt Ord Psych Eval - Conf. 05/21/2021
33. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 05/21/2021
34. 3175 - Ord Re: Hearing Procedure 05/21/2021
35. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 05/21/2021
36. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 05/19/2021
37. 4500 - PSI - Confidential 05/19/2021
38. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 04/29/2021
39. 1015 - Acknowledgment of Receipt 04/29/2021
40. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 04/20/2021
41. 1785 - Guilty Plea Memo/Agreement 04/20/2021
42. 4265 - Waiver of Preliminary Exam 04/19/2021
43. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 04/19/2021
44. 1800 - Information 04/19/2021
45. 3870 - Request 04/19/2021
46. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 04/16/2021
47. 3175 - Ord Re: Hearing Procedure 04/16/2021
48. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 04/15/2021
49. 1491 - Pretrl Srvcs Assessment Report 04/15/2021
50. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 04/14/2021
51. 3937 - SJDC Hearing 04/14/2021
52. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 04/08/2021
53. 4075 - Substitution of Counsel 04/08/2021
54. 4075 - Substitution of Counsel 04/08/2021
55. 3700 - Proceedings 04/08/2021
56. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 04/08/2021
57. 2587 - Notice of Setting 04/08/2021
58. 2522 - Notice of Bindover 04/08/2021
59. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 04/08/2021
60. 3700 - Proceedings 04/08/2021
The District Court is comprised of 16 departments. Each Judge sits in a differently numbered Department. When a Judge leaves service, the new Judge's name replaces the former Judge's name on all matters pending and previously closed in that department. This change will not reflect that a previous sitting Judge presided over a matter.