Detailed Case Information - ARB25-00309

Case Description: ARB25-00309 - JOHNATHON TREVINO VS NATE MCNUTT (ARB)

Filing Date: 09/17/2025

Case Type: AZ - ARBITRATION

Status: Pending Active

Printer Friendly Version

Case Parties

Seq No. Type Name
1 JUDG - Judge SIGURDSON, KATHLEEN
2 PLTF - Plaintiff TREVINO, JOHNATHON MICHAEL
4 DEFT - Defendant MCNUTT, NATE
5 ATTY - Attorney Direnzo, Esq., Michael A.
6 ATTY - Attorney Armstrong, Esq., Karl W.
8 ARB - Arbitrator Smith, Esq., Karl H.

Reference Numbers

No Cross Reference Numbers Available

Event Information

Date/Time Hearing Judge Event Description Outcome
1. 11/20/2025 at 1:46 PM Honorable KATHLEEN SIGURDSON S1 - Request for Submission
- filed on:

Docket Entry Information

Docket Description Date Filed
1. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 11/20/2025
2. 3373 - Other ... 11/20/2025
3. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 11/20/2025
4. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 11/20/2025
5. 2589 - Notice of Stricken Document 11/20/2025
6. 3860 - Request for Submission 11/20/2025
7. 3860 - Request for Submission 11/20/2025
8. 2260 - Mtn to Relieve Counsel 11/20/2025
9. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 10/13/2025
10. 2610 - Notice ... 10/13/2025
11. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 10/06/2025
12. FIE - **Document Filed in Error 10/06/2025
13. FIE - **Document Filed in Error 10/06/2025
14. A140 - Appointment of Arbitrator 10/06/2025
15. A600 - List of Stricken Arbitrators 09/25/2025
16. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 09/25/2025
17. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 09/19/2025
18. 2589 - Notice of Stricken Document 09/19/2025
19. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 09/19/2025
20. A600 - List of Stricken Arbitrators 09/19/2025
21. NEF - Proof of Electronic Service 09/17/2025
22. A100 - Assignment to Arbitration 09/17/2025
The District Court is comprised of 16 departments. Each Judge sits in a differently numbered Department. When a Judge leaves service, the new Judge's name replaces the former Judge's name on all matters pending and previously closed in that department. This change will not reflect that a previous sitting Judge presided over a matter.